Faith and Inquiry: A Rational Perspective

Religion (13.11.2016)

Religion can be viewed as a rudimentary form of software—a system designed to impose rules and program human behavior. Unfortunately, many lose their capacity for critical thinking under the weight of religious pressure. The fear of detachment from faith often prevents individuals from questioning their beliefs. For many, living in comfortable ignorance is more appealing than the arduous pursuit of truth. After all, being happy in a predefined reality is far easier than the restless endeavor of discovery.

However, what if there is no divine design? Is it not a tragedy to confine one’s life within narrow boundaries simply because of a fear of questioning? Below are several questions that I genuinely seek logical answers for—answers that could, in fact, lead me to embrace faith:

1. The Scale of the Cosmos

Compare the vast, perhaps infinite, universe with our tiny world. If we accept the universe as a whole, our planet—and consequently ourselves—is less than a speck of dust. Why would the creator of such immense magnitude be preoccupied with us? What is the ultimate purpose of this vast creation? To a truly rational mind, the idea that we are the center of cosmic attention seems illogical. While I cannot disprove the existence of a higher power, the sheer scale suggests that such a being might not be what we have been taught to believe.

2. The Question of Origin

If we assume that everything requires a creator, does that logic not apply to the creator as well? I am not claiming that everything happened “by chance,” as that might seem even more improbable than the existence of a God. Both scenarios—self-creation and a creator without a cause—present a profound logical paradox.

3. Mythology vs. Modern Religion

Have you ever compared contemporary religions with ancient mythologies? Consider the Greeks: a civilization that laid the foundations of literature, science, and democratic justice. How could such an intellectually advanced society believe in and worship a pantheon of gods that we now view as mere fables? Today, we find their beliefs “mythological,” yet we hold our current religions to be “absolute.” What is the fundamental difference? Furthermore, the concepts of heaven and hell have appeared in various forms across almost every culture for millennia. Are these universal truths, or are they simply cultural adaptations of the same human anxieties?

Conclusion: The Limits of Human Intellect

We are, in many ways, fragile beings. Our intellect may not be the ultimate advantage we believe it to be. While it distinguishes us from other animals, I suspect that “absolute truth” remains fundamentally beyond our grasp. No matter how much science advances, trying to deduce the ultimate reality from the tiny fraction of information available to the human mind seems ambitious, if not foolish. In a world where skepticism is perhaps the only honest stance, dogmatism remains a concept I cannot reconcile with.